The
Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty (DCSD) have accused
Bjørn Lomborg the (statistician) author of
The Sceptical Environmentalist of
bending the facts to suit his arguments, with the following concluding remarks...
"Objectively speaking, the publication of the work under consideration is
deemed to fall within the concept of scientific dishonesty.
In view of the subjective requirements made in terms of intent or gross negligence, however, Bjørn Lomborg's publication cannot fall within the bounds of this characterization. Conversely,
the publication is deemed clearly contrary to the standards of good scientific practice."
One of the people who asked the DCSD to assess the scientific merit of Lomborg's book,
Jeff Harvey, a former editor of the scientific journal
Nature and currently a senior scientist at the
Netherlands Institute of Ecology said:
"It is unfortunate that I and many others felt it necessary to take Lomborg and his book to task for the
veritable deluge of inaccuracies it contains, but Lomborg has
veered well across the line that divides controversial, if not competent, science from unrepentant incompetence."
He added: "
Scientists must be held accountable for serious transgressions that are committed without responsibility, and this judgement goes at least some way to underlining Lomborg's dishonesty."
See the
Green Alliance's
10 pinches of salt document, the
Anti-Lomborg pages and the
Grist Magazine special for further
detailed critiques of Lomborg's use of statistics...
...and
Tech Central Station or
Lomborg's own site for the opposite points of view.